Behavioural Science & Sociocultural Psychiatry · Paper A
French and Raven's bases of social power
French and Raven's model matters because it breaks 'power' or 'influence' down into distinct sources, and identifying which source is actually at work explains why an instruction is followed, or ignored. They described five original bases of social power, later extended to six, each rooted in a different reason people comply with another person's influence. For example, imagine a consultant whose instructions are followed partly because of their senior position (legitimate power) and partly because juniors genuinely respect their clinical judgement (expert power), the same behaviour, obeying an instruction, can rest on entirely different underlying power sources.
Reward power rests on the ability to give something desired. Coercive power rests on the ability to punish or withhold something wanted. Legitimate power rests on a recognised position or role, such as 'consultant' or 'manager'. Referent power rests on identification with or admiration for the person. Expert power rests on recognised knowledge or skill. Informational power, added later, rests on access to or control of needed information. Take a junior colleague who follows a senior nurse's advice mainly because they personally admire her, that is referent power, distinct from following the same advice purely because of her job title. Naming which base of power is operating helps explain compliance that persists, or collapses, once that specific source of power is removed, e.g. expert-based influence often outlasts a change in job title, whereas purely legitimate power does not.