Behavioural Science & Sociocultural Psychiatry · Paper A
Motivation theories
Motivation theories matter because they explain WHY behaviour is initiated and directed, using different, complementary mechanisms rather than one single explanation. Drive-reduction theory proposes behaviour is motivated by the need to reduce an internal state of tension caused by an unmet biological need, restoring homeostasis (the body's stable internal balance). For example, imagine feeling thirsty after exercise, that internal tension DRIVES you to drink, and drinking reduces the tension and restores balance.
Arousal theory proposes people are motivated to maintain an OPTIMAL level of physiological arousal, neither too bored (under-aroused) nor too anxious (over-aroused). Incentive theory proposes behaviour is PULLED by external rewards, rather than pushed by an internal deficit, e.g. working extra hours specifically for a bonus rather than out of any internal tension. Intrinsic motivation is doing something for its own inherent satisfaction, while extrinsic motivation is doing something for an external reward or to avoid punishment. The overjustification effect is the finding that adding an external reward for an already-enjoyed activity can actually REDUCE a person's intrinsic motivation for it afterwards. Self-determination theory proposes intrinsic motivation depends on three basic psychological needs: autonomy (feeling in control of one's own actions), competence (feeling effective and capable), and relatedness (feeling connected to others). For example, imagine a child who loves drawing for fun, then starts being paid for each drawing, and later draws much less once the payments stop, that drop illustrates the overjustification effect directly. In practice, this means clinicians and educators are cautious about adding external rewards to an already-enjoyed healthy behaviour, since it can undermine the person's own intrinsic motivation to keep doing it.